Aspectos clínicos, anatomopatológicos, recidiva local e sobrevida de pacientes com carcinoma de mama tratadas pela cirurgia conservadora

Clinical aspects, histologic findings, local recurrence and survival rates in patients with breast cancer treated with breast conservation surgery

Authors

  • Amanda Neves Machado Mestre em Ciências pela Universidade Federal de São Paulo (Unifesp).
  • Gil Facina Professor afiliado da disciplina de Mastologia do Departamento de Ginecologia da Unifesp.
  • Luiz Henrique Gebrim Professor livre-docente da disciplina de Mastologia do Departamento de Ginecologia da Unifesp.

Keywords:

Breast neoplasms, Treatment; Segmental mastectomy, Local neoplasm recurrence, Survival

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the age, the tumor size, the clinical stage, the histologic feature, survival and local
recurrence rates of the patients treated with breast conservation therapy in early breast cancer at Federal
University of Sao Paulo (Unifesp). Methods: A retrospective study ofthe patient's medical records was
conducted. The patients selected for the study were those who had undergone breast conservation therapy
for early stage breast cancer, such as quadrantectomy with axillary dissection and radiotherapy, between
1990 and 2002 at Mastology Discipline of Gynecology Department of Unifesp. The age, tumor size, clinical stage, histologic type, survival and local recurrence rates were assessed and compared with datafrom
the current literature. Results: The patients aged 23 to 88 years (median = 53.7).The tumor size was 0.5
to 4.0 cm (median 1.9 cm); 60.1 percent of women were in stage I, 34.4% in stage IIA, 4.9% in IIB and
0.6% in III. Concerning histologic feature, 83.1% were invasive ductal carcinoma and 7.1% lobular
carcinoma. The survival rate of 97.3 % and local recurrence rate of 3.9 in a 44.5 months offollow-up.
Conclusions: The breast conservation therapy has become the method of choicefor the treatment of early
stage breast carcinoma and our results were comparable with the literature.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Benda RK, Mendenhall NP, Lind DS, Cendan JC, Shea BF, Richardson LC, et al. Breast conserving therapy (BCT) for early stage breast cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2004;85:14-27.

2. Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del Vecchio M, Banfi A, Clemente C, De

Lena M, et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantecсtomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small

cancers of the breast. N Engl J Med. 1981;305:6-11.

3. Salvadori B, Veronesi U. Conservative methods for breast cancer of

small size: the experience of the National Cancer Institute, Milan

(1973-1998). Breast. 1999;8:311-4.

4. Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond CK, Wolmark N, Wickerham

DL, Cronin WM. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow

up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with

lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast

cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;333:1456-61.

5.

6.

Jacobson JA, Danforth DN, Cowan KH, d'Angelo T, Steinberg

SM, Pierce L, et al. Ten year results of a comparison of conservation with mastectomy in the treatment of stage I and II breast

cancer. N Engl J Med. 1995;332:907-11

Van Dongen JA, Bartelink H, Fentiman IS, Lerut T, Mignolet

F, Olthuis G, et al. Factors influencing local relapse and survival

and results of salvage treatment after breast conserving therapy in

operable breast cancer: EORTC trial 10801, breast conservation

compared with mastectomy in TNM Stage I and II breast cancer.

Eur J Cancer. 1992;28A:801-5.

7. Arriagada R, Le MG, Rochard F, Contesso G. Conservative treatment versus mastectomy in early breast cancer: patterns of failure

with 15 years of follow up data. Institute Gustave Roussy Breast

Cancer Group. J Clin Oncol. 1996;14:1558-64.

8. Morrow M, Strom EA, Basset LW, Dershaw DD, Fowble B. Giuliano A, et al. Standard for breast conservation therapy in the

management of invasive breast carcinoma. CA Cancer J Clin.

2002:52:277-300.

9. Kalbfleisch JD, Prentice RL. The statistical analysis of failure time

data. New York: Wiley Series in Probability and Satistics; 1980.

10. Agresti A. An introduction to categorical data analysis. New York:

John Wiley and Sons; 1996.

11. Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L, Greco M, Saccozzi R, Luini

12.

A, et al. Twenty-year follow up of a randomized study comparing

breast conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast

cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:1227-32.

Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher

ER, et al. Twenty year follow up of a randomized trial compаring total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med.

2002:347:1233-41.

13. Veronesi U, Del Vecchio M, Manzari A, Andreola S, Greco M,

Luini A, et al. Local recurrences and distant metastases after conservative breast cancer treatments: partly independent events. J

Natl Cancer Inst. 1995;87:19-27.

14. Veronesi U, Salvadori B, Luini A, Greco M, Saccozzi R, del Vecchio M, et al. Breast conservation is a safe method in patients with

small cancer of the breast. Long term results of three randomized

trials on 1,973 patients. Eur J Cancer. 1995;31A:1574-9.

15. Poggi MM, Danforth DN, Sciuto LC, Smith SL, Steinberg SM,

Liewehr DJ, et al. Eighteen-year results in the treatment of early

breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapy: The National Cancer Institute Randomized Trial. Cancer.

2003;98:697-702.

Published

2026-07-26

How to Cite

Machado, A. N., Facina, G., & Gebrim, L. H. (2026). Aspectos clínicos, anatomopatológicos, recidiva local e sobrevida de pacientes com carcinoma de mama tratadas pela cirurgia conservadora: Clinical aspects, histologic findings, local recurrence and survival rates in patients with breast cancer treated with breast conservation surgery. Mastology, 18(2). Retrieved from https://mastology.org/journal/article/view/2022

Issue

Section

Original Articles