953 – Adherence to sentinel lymph node biopsy guidelines in breast cancer: temporal trends in a real-world public reference center cohort

Authors

  • Marcelo Antonini Brazilian Breast Cancer Association Team – São Paulo (SP), Brazil. Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Luana Medrado Vitorino Oliveira Brazilian Breast Cancer Association Team – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Andre Mattar Brazilian Breast Cancer Association Team – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Felipe Zerwes Brazilian Breast Cancer Association Team – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Francisco Pimentel Cavalcante Brazilian Breast Cancer Association Team – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Eduardo Camargo Millen Brazilian Breast Cancer Association Team – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Fabricio Palermo Brenelli Brazilian Breast Cancer Association Team – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Antonio Luis Frasson Brazilian Breast Cancer Association Team – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29289/259453942025V36S10953

Keywords:

breast neoplasms, sentinel lymph node biopsy, neoadjuvant therapy, guideline adherence, time factors

Abstract

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the standard approach for axillary staging in clinically node-negative
breast cancer and has progressively expanded after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However, adherence to evidencebased axillary de-escalation remains variable, particularly in public healthcare settings. Objectives: To evaluate adherence to guideline-based indications for SLNB in women with non-metastatic invasive breast cancer treated in a public
referral center and to identify factors associated with non-adherent axillary management.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted including women with non-metastatic invasive breast
cancer treated at a public reference center in São Paulo, Brazil, from 2015 to 2025. The primary endpoint was agreement
between the guideline-based theoretical SLNB indication and the procedure actually performed. Secondary endpoints
included adherence by clinical setting, factors associated with non-adherence, and temporal trends.
Results: A total of 1,672 patients were analyzed. Overall, 1,298 (77.6%) were managed according to guideline-based SLNB
criteria, whereas 374 (22.4%) underwent discordant management. Adherence was higher in upfront surgery than after
NAC (80.8% vs. 67.8%; p<0.001). In the upfront setting, agreement between theoretical indication and actual practice was
moderate (κ=0.578; p<0.001), whereas in the post-NAC setting it was negligible (κ=0.028; p=0.300). In upfront surgery, older
age, lobular histology (odds ratio [OR] 6.6; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.7–16.2), and positive SLNB (OR 6.0; 95%CI 3.7–9.9)
were independently associated with incorrect management. After NAC, the Luminal/human epidermal growth factor
receptor 2 (HER2)-positive subtype (OR 2.50; 95%CI 1.10–5.66), T3–T4 tumors (OR 3.40; 95%CI 1.45–7.98), subsequent axillary surgery (OR 6.44; 95%CI 2.91–14.26), and SLNB omission were associated with non-adherence. Adherence increased
over time, with a mean annual rise of 1.84 percentage points (R²=99.1%; p<0.001).
Conclusion: Evidence-based axillary de-escalation was well incorporated into upfront surgery but remained less consistent after NAC, supporting institutional protocols, surgical education, and improved technical resources in public practice.
Ethics: The study was approved by Plataforma Brazil (CAAE 83327324.0.0000.5463).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-19

How to Cite

Antonini, M., Oliveira, L. M. V., Mattar, A., Zerwes, F., Cavalcante, F. P., Millen, E. C., … Frasson, A. L. (2026). 953 – Adherence to sentinel lymph node biopsy guidelines in breast cancer: temporal trends in a real-world public reference center cohort. Mastology, 36(suppl. 1). https://doi.org/10.29289/259453942025V36S10953

Issue

Section

Locoregional Treatment Section