1049 – Incidental findings in risk reducing mastectomy: incidence and predictors in a real-world cohort
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29289/25945394V36S11049Keywords:
mastectomy, breast neoplasms, incidental findings, risk assessmentAbstract
Purpose: Risk reducing mastectomy (RRM) is an established preventive strategy for women at high genetic and/or familial risk of breast cancer. Histopathological evaluation of RRM specimens may identify incidental findings (IFs), including
occult malignancies and precursor lesions; however, their incidence and associated predictors remain insufficiently characterized. This study aimed to estimate the incidence of IFs and identify associated factors in a Brazilian cohort.
Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted among 154 women who underwent RRM at a tertiary public
cancer center (Women’s Hospital Professor José Aristodemo Pinotti CAISM/UNICAMP, University of Campinas, Brazil)
between 2013 and 2025. Eligible patients carried pathogenic/likely pathogenic germline variants and/or met NCCN highrisk criteria, and had normal breast imaging within six months before surgery. Histopathological evaluation followed an
institutional protocol with extensive tissue sampling. Multivariate logistic regression was used to evaluate demographic,
clinical, and surgical predictors of IFs.
Results: IFs were identified in 35% (54/154) of the patients, including 10.4% malignant lesions (DCIS or invasive carcinoma) and 24.6% atypical proliferative lesions. Breast MRI was performed in 14 patients, where Ifs were detected in 21.4%
(3/14), compared with 36.4% (51/140) among those without MRI, with no significant association (p=0.38). In multivariable
analysis, increasing age (OR 1.071) was an independent predictor of incidental findings (IFs). For invasive and DCIS outcomes, age remained the only significant predictor (OR 1.069). Genetic status was not significantly associated with IFs.
Conclusion: In this single-institution cohort, IFs were frequently identified in RRM specimens. Older age was the main
clinical predictor, while genetic status and preoperative MRI were not significantly associated with IFs. These findings
support individualized risk stratification and comprehensive pathological assessment when counseling patients undergoing RRM, particularly in resource-limited settings.
Ethics: Research Ethics Committee Approval (CAAE 54179621.1.0000.5404).
Downloads
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Thaysa Estevão Fernandes, Daniel Imbassahy Sá Bittencourt Câmara Silva, Augusto Ostermann Magalhães, Mariana Decco Faucz, Renato Torresan, Fabrício Pallermo Brenelli, Geisilene Russano Paiva Silva, César Cabello dos Santos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.






