Analysis of breast diseases diagnosis in young women who presented mammary symptoms
Keywords:
Mammary Simptoms, Breast Diseases, Young WomenAbstract
The aim was to analyze the diagnosis of breast diseases of a group of young women who had breast
symptoms. A study observational and retrospective was conducted in a sample of 101 women aged forty
years or less and who had breast complaints, attending a clinic for Mastology in the city of Santo Angelo.
Among the 101 women, the mean age was 30.8 years. Most women (40.6%, 41/101) reported pain and
nodule. In the clinical examination ofthe breasts, the majority (60.4%, 61/101) had nodule. Regarding
to mammography, the majority (62.3%, 43/69) presented BIRADS 1 and 2, and between women who
underwent ultrasound examination, 100% presented BIRADS 2. Among the patients who underwent
cytological test, most (91.2%, 31/34) had negative for malignidade result, of which the majority was
fibroadenoma. On histopathological exam, performed for 21 patients, most (67%, 14/21) had negative
for malignancy result. This work demonstrates the importance ofinvestigating young women with breast
symptoms because of the 101 young women studied, 6.9% (7/101) of women with breast complaints had
breast cancer.
Downloads
References
1. Menke CH, Biazús JV, Xavier NL, Cavalheiro JA, Rabin EG,
Bittelbrunn A, et al. Rotinas em mastologia. 2. ed. Porto Alegre:
Artmed, 2007.2. Acevedo JC, Aliaga N. Patologia benigna de la mama: información
para el médico general. Rev Med Clin Condes. 2009;20:75-83.
3. Sivini FN, Molina A, Costa CFF, Sivini FMP. Mastalgias cíclicas:
tratamento não medicamentoso (orientação verbal). Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2001;23:77-82.
4. Nazário ACP, Rego MF, Oliveira VM. Nódulos benignos da
mama: uma revisão dos diagnósticos diferenciais e conduta. Rev
Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007;29:211-4.
5. Robbins S, Cotran R. Bases patológicas das doenças. 8. ed. Rio de
Janeiro: Elsevier, 2006.
6. Andrea CE, Sobral ACL, Costa ESM, Totsugui JT, Araújo SR,
Collaço LM. Citologia do derrame papilar. J Bras Patol Med Lab. 2006;42:333-7.
7. Barreto MF, Petrelli ASC, Djahjah MCR, Koch HA. Câncer de
mama em mulheres até 40 anos: aspectos radiológicos, clínicos e
anatomopatológicos. Rev Imagem. 2006;28:1-6.
8. Bojanini JF, Villegas JC. Características clínicas de la enfermedad
benigna de la mama. Revista CES Medicina.1994;8:55-62.
9.
10.
Crippa CG, Hallal ALC, Dellagiustina AR, Traebert ÉE, Gondin
G, Pereira C. Perfil clínico e epidemiológico do câncer de mama
em mulheres jovens. ACM Arq Catarin Med. 2003:32:50-8.
Salles MA, Matias MARF, Perez AA, Gobbi H. Carcinoma ductal in situ da mama: critérios para diagnóstico e abordagem em
hospitais públicos de Belo Horizonte. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet.
2006;28:721-7.
11. Vieira AV, Toigo FT. Classificação BIRADS: categorização de
4.968 mamografias. Radiol Bras. 2002;35:205-8.
12. Roveda DJ, Piato S, Oliveira VM, Rinaldi JF, Ferreira CAP, Fleury
ECF. Valores preditivos das categorias 3, 4 e 5 do sistema BIRADS em lesões mamárias nodulares não palpáveis avaliadas por mamografia, ultrassonografia e ressonância magnética. Radiol Bras.
2007;40:93-8.
13. Reis FJC, Andrade JM, Velludo MASL, Oliveira AS, Feitosa RB.
Marana HRC, et al. Punção biópsia aspirativa (PBA) com agulha
fina no diagnóstico diferencial de patologias da mama. Rev Bras
Ginecol Obstet. 1998;20:209-13.
14. Moutinho MSP, Elias S, Kemp C, Nazário ACP, Baracat EC. Acurácia diagnóstica da biópsia percutânea com agulha grossa orientada por estereotaxia nas lesões mamárias categoria BIRADS 4. Rev
Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2007;29:608-13.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Edison Barbosa de Vargas, Ana Rúbia Baú, Vera Regina Andrade Vargas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
