Sensory analysis in the conventional post-surgery for breast cancer

Authors

  • Fernanda Aparecida de Ornelas Docente do curso de Fisioterapia da Universidade Católica de Santos, doutora pela Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - Unesp.
  • José Ricardo Paciencia Rodrigues Docente do curso de Medicina da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - Unesp,
  • Gilberto Uemura Docente do curso de Medicina da Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu - Unesp,

Keywords:

Breast cancer, Physiotherapy, Intercostobraquial nerve

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the response sensory conventional, post-surgery for breast cancer in women who
underwent axillary lymph node dissection in the different techniques of rehabilitation in the sensory nerve
pathway intercostobraquial (NICB) and check after three months. Methods: Clinicalstudy, prospective,
randomized, finalized in 2006, in hospital in Santos, Sao Paulo, composed of120 women who underwent
surgery for breast cancer with axillary lymph node dissection by the same surgical procedure to preserve
the NICB, subdivided into four equal groups. The GI (sensory stimulation with balls, sensiball, fisiobol
and smooth), GII (lymphatic drainage), GII (kit of different textures) and GIV (control), all subject to
ten physiotherapy interventions. The conventional assessment used two tubes for testing with hot and cold
water, brush and needle. The evaluations were conducted on three occasions. The M1 (pre-intervention),
the M2 (post-intervention) after the ten sessions and M3 (washout) after three months of M2. The region
targeted for sensory evaluation and intervention were two points (P1 and P2) in the NICB dermatome,
located on the medial side and back of the super-arm. Results: With statistical treatment of Goodman,
was reported improvement (p < 0.005) in thermalsensitivity in GIII (PI) and GIV (P1), tactile sensitivityGII (P1), painful sensitivity only in GII (P1) and worse (p > 0.005) in GIII (P2) and GIV (P2) towards
thermal sensitivity, tactile and painful. Conclusion: Only after the technique of sensory stimulation
with lymphatic drainage, there was positive response to the amendment forward sensory (hypoesthesia) in
dermatome nerve ICB, remaining after three months.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Almeida AM, Prado MA, Guidorizzi LLF, Rossini FP, et al. Mulheres com câncer de mama: um estudo de morbidade. Acta Oncol

Bras. 2002;22(2):263-9.

2. Instituto Nacional do Câncer (INCA). Estimativa de câncer para

2006. Disponível em: <http://www.inca.gov.br>. Acesso em: 26

maio 2008.

3. Giuliano AE, Jones RC, Brennan M, Statman R. Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 1997;15:2345-50.4. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-node biopsy

to avoid axillary dissection in breast cancer with clinically negative

lymph-nodes. Lancet. 1997;132:1864-7.

5. Camargo MC, Marx AG. Reabilitação física no câncer de mama.

São Paulo: Roca; 2000.

6. Kopans DB. Imagem da mama. 2ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi;

2000.

7. Hoppenfeld S. Exame do ombro. In: Propedêutica ortopédica -

Coluna e extremidades. Rio de Janeiro: Atheneu; 1993.

8. Humble C. Lymphedema: incidence, pathophysiology, management, and nursing care. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995;22(10):1503-11.

9. Brodal A. Anatomia neurológica: com correções clínicas. 3ª ed.

São Paulo: Roca; 1988.

10. Aitken DR, Minton JP. Complications associated with mastectomy. Surg Clin North Am. 1983;63:1331-52.

11. Assa J. The intercostobrachial nerve in radical mastectomy. J Surg

Oncol. 1974;6:123-6.

12. Ivens D, Hoe AL, Podd TJ, Hamilton CR, Taylor I, Royle GT.

Assessment of morbidity from complete axillary dissection. Br J

Cancer. 1992:66:136-8.

13. Wingate L. Efficacy of physical therapy for patients who have undergone mastectomies. Phys Therapy. 1985;65:896-900.

14. Wingate L, Croghan I, Natarajan N, Michalek AM, Jordan C.

Rehabilitation of the mastectomy patient: a randomized, blind,

prospective study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1989;70:21-4.

15. Schultz I, Barholm M, Grondal S. Delayed shoulder exercises inreducing seroma frequency after modified radical mastectomy: a

prospective randomized study. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997;4:293-7.16. Chen SH, Chen MF. Timing of shoulder exercise after modified

radical mastectomy: a prospective study. Chang Gung Med J.

1999;22:37-43.

17. Gaskin TA, Lobuglio A, Kelly P, Doss M, Pizitz N. STRETCH: A

rehabilitive program for patients with breast cancer. South Med J.

1989;82:467-9.

18. Silva MPP, et al. Movimento do ombro após cirurgia por carcinoma invasor da mama: estudo randomizado prospectivo controlado

de exercícios livres versus limitados a 90° no pós-operatório. Rev

Bras Ginecol Obstet (Rio de Janeiro). 2004;26(2):125-30p.

19. Brown BA. Peripheral nerve injury. In: Rosenberg RN, editor. The

Clinical Neurosciences. 1st ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone;

1983. p. 1491-5.

20. Panobianco MS, Mamede MV. Complicações e intercorrências

associadas ao edema de braço nos três primeiros meses pós mastectomia. Rev Lat Am Enf (Ribeirão Preto). 2002;10(4):544-51.

21. Dumitru D. Electrodiagnostic Medicine. St. Louis: Mosby; 1995.

878 р.

22. LENT, R. Cem bilhões de neurônios: conceitos fundamentais em

neurociência. São Paulo: Atheneu, 2004.

23. Guyton AC. Fisiologia humana. 6ª ed. Rio de Janeiro: Guanabara

Koogan; 1988.

24. Sanvito WL. Propedêutica neurológica básica. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2000.

25. Guirro ECO. Fisioterapia dermato-funcional. 3a ed. São Paulo:

Manole; 2002.

26. Cambier J, Masson M, Dehen H. Patologia dos nervos periféricos.

In: Cambier J, Masson M, Dehen H, editores. Manual de neurologia. 1a ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ateneu; 1988. p. 198-210.

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

de Ornelas, F. A., Rodrigues, J. R. P., & Uemura, G. (2026). Sensory analysis in the conventional post-surgery for breast cancer. Mastology, 19(2). Retrieved from https://mastology.org/journal/article/view/2038

Issue

Section

Original Articles