The effects of resistance training versus combined training on the health-related quality of life levels of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy

Authors

  • Anderson Garcia Silva Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Medicina – Goiânia (GO), Brazil.
  • Rafael Ribeiro Alves Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Medicina – Goiânia (GO), Brazil.
  • Nathan Damasio Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Educação Física – Goiânia (GO), Brazil.
  • Ellen Gomes de Oliveira Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Educação Física – Goiânia (GO), Brazil.
  • Flavia Batista Gomes Noleto Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Educação Física – Goiânia (GO), Brazil.
  • Naiany Pereira Silva Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Medicina – Goiânia (GO), Brazil.
  • Vitor Alves Marques Universidade Estadual de Goiás, Faculdade de Educação Física – Goiânia (GO), Brazil.
  • Carlos Alexandre Vieira Universidade Federal de Goiás, Faculdade de Medicina – Goiânia (GO), Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29289/259453942025V35S1021

Keywords:

cancer, sedentary behavior, physical exercise

Abstract

Objective: To compare the effects of resistance training (RT), combined training (CT), and control group (CON) on the
health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Methods: A randomized clinical trial (Brazilian Registry of Clinical Trials nº 16497) was conducted with 19 women undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy, distributed in RT (n=6; age 44.33 standard deviation ±5.50), CT (n=6; age 43.80±8.64), and CON (n=6;
age 40.42±7.96). The RT group performed only resistance training, while the CT group performed the same resistance
training protocol adding an aerobic training session at the end. Both groups (RT and CT) underwent physical exercise
sessions once a week for 12 weeks. The CON group received only the usual care. HRQoL was assessed by the Functional
Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-B). Data normality was analyzed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. A one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted for parametric data to compare groups at baseline. Finally, a factorial ANOVA
with repeated measures was employed to evaluate the effects of group, time, and group-by-time interaction. The analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle, so that all randomized participants were included in the analysis, regardless
of protocol adherence or data completeness. The study was approved by the ethics committee of the Federal University
of Goiás (CAAE: 50717115.4.0000.5083). Results: One-way ANOVA showed that the groups had similar HRQoL scores at
baseline (p=0.93). The factorial ANOVA did not detect significant effects for group (p=0.87), time (p=0.59), or group-by-time
interaction (p=0.87), indicating that HRQoL levels did not change throughout the intervention, and were not influenced
by different training or control protocols. Conclusion: There were no significant changes in HRQoL levels in the RT, CT,
and CON groups after 12 weeks of physical exercise during neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-24

How to Cite

Silva, A. G., Alves, R. R., Damasio, N., Oliveira, E. G. de, Noleto, F. B. G., Silva, N. P., … Vieira, C. A. (2026). The effects of resistance training versus combined training on the health-related quality of life levels of breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Mastology, 35(suppl.1). https://doi.org/10.29289/259453942025V35S1021

Issue

Section

Fast Presentation