Treatment patterns and safety of adjuvant therapy after chemoimmunotherapy for early-stage triplenegative breast cancer in a real-world scenario: the Neo-Real/GBECAM-0123 study

Autores

  • Renata Rodrigues da Cunha Colombo Bonadio Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Laura Testa Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Monique Tavares Hospital A. C. Camargo Cancer Center – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Daniele A Assad-Suzuki Hospital Sírio-Libanês Medical Oncology Department – Brasília (DF), Brazil.
  • Daniela Dornelles Rosa Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Serviço de Oncologia – Porto Alegre (RS), Brazil.
  • Débora de Melo Gagliato Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, Centro de Oncologia– São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Maria del Pilar Estevez Diz Universidade de São Paulo, Faculdade de Medicina, Instituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo – São Paulo (SP), Brazil.
  • Romualdo Barroso Sousa Hospital Brasília, DASA Oncologia – Distrito Federal, Brasília, Brazil.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29289/259453942025V35S1002

Palavras-chave:

breast neoplasms, adjuvant chemotherapy, immunotherapy, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors, capecitabine

Resumo

Introduction: The KEYNOTE-522 trial established neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (P+CT) followed by
adjuvant pembrolizumab as the standard of care for stage II–III triple-negative breast cancer. However, integrating this regimen
with other adjuvant therapies, such as capecitabine or olaparib, remains uncertain in clinical practice. Objective: This
study aimed to evaluate real-world treatment patterns and safety outcomes of adjuvant therapies following neoadjuvant
P+CT. Methods: This multicentric Neo-Real/GBECAM-0123 study included triple-negative breast cancer patients treated
with neoadjuvant P+CT since July 2010 across ten cancer centers. The analysis focused on treatment patterns and safety,
particularly grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs). Results: Out of the 410 patients enrolled, 359 underwent surgery and 185 completed
adjuvant therapy. The median age was 43 years; 69.5% had stage II and 25.8% had stage III disease. A pathologic
complete response was achieved in 62.5% (n=218); among them, 85.9% continued adjuvant pembrolizumab. In breast cancer
wild-type unknown patients with residual disease (n=114), 54.4% received pembrolizumab plus capecitabine (P+C),
26.3% pembrolizumab alone, and 10.5% capecitabine alone. Among breast cancer-mutated patients with residual disease
(n=12), 75% received pembrolizumab plus olaparib (P+O), 16.7% P+C, and 8.3% olaparib alone. Grade ≥3 AEs rates were
higher with P+C (16.3%) and P+O (14.3%) compared to pembrolizumab alone (6.3%; p=0.057). Anemia grade ≥3 occurred
in 14.3% of P+O patients vs. 0% pembrolizumab alone, while diarrhea (6.1%) and hand-foot syndrome (8.2%) were more
frequent with P+C. No increase in immune-related grade ≥3 AEs was observed with combinations. Conclusion: In a realworld
scenario, most patients with triple-negative breast cancer continued adjuvant pembrolizumab after a pathologic
complete response, while adjuvant capecitabine and adjuvant olaparib were frequently used in combination with pembrolizumab
for those with residual disease. Combined adjuvant strategies showed higher rates of grade ≥3 AEs and drug
discontinuations. The efficacy of the combined adjuvant strategies remains to be determined.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-02-24

Como Citar

Bonadio, R. R. da C. C., Testa, L., Tavares, M., Assad-Suzuki, D. A., Rosa, D. D., Gagliato, D. de M., … Sousa, R. B. (2026). Treatment patterns and safety of adjuvant therapy after chemoimmunotherapy for early-stage triplenegative breast cancer in a real-world scenario: the Neo-Real/GBECAM-0123 study. Mastology, 35(suppl.1). https://doi.org/10.29289/259453942025V35S1002

Edição

Seção

General Session