Sensitivity and specificity of axillary sentinel lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer

Authors

  • Sílvia Oliveira Bezerra Médica Mastologista do Centro Integrado de Saúde Amaury Medeiros, Recife, PE.
  • Antonio Simão dos Santos Figueira FIlho Professor titular de Mastologia da Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Universidade de Pernambuco - (FCM-UPE).

Keywords:

Sensitivity and specificity., Breast neoplasias, Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the agreement of histopathologic findings on sentinel and axillary lymph nodes
after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced breast cancer. Methods: Within a prospective, clinical
study, lymph node groups of 21 women, carriers of breast cancer in stadium III or IV, submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical mastectomy after lymph node biopsy by patent blue, at the Hospital
Universitário Oswaldo Cruz, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil, from October 2005 to October 2006, were
histopathologically compared. Statistical Package for Social Sciences 13.0 software was used to perform
Fisher exact test, with significance level of 5%, Kappa test and calculi of agreement, sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, false negatives and positives ratios. One excluded 7/28
(25%) patients due to the impossibility to identify sentinel lymph node. Results: Excised sentinel lymphnodes varied from one (19/21; 90.5% patients) to two (2/21; 9.5% ofpatients). Comparing sentinel to
axillary lymph nodes forpositivity of neoplasic cells, rates of agreement, false negatives and positives, sensibility and specificity were: 71.4%, 38.5%, 12.5%, 61.5% and 87.5%, respectively, with significant
concordance degree (p = 0.027; к = 0.447). Conclusion: Related to other studies, one identified minor
concordance rate, higherfalse negative rate and equal identification rate, associated to low sensibility,
high specificity and a significant concordance degree.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bowers K, Liu Y, Ghesani N, Kim SH. A level III sentinel lymph

node in breast cancer. World J Sur Oncol. 2006;4:31.

2. Ferrari A, Dionigi P, Rovera F, Boni L, et al. Multifocality and

multicentricity are not contraindications for sentinel lymph node

biopsy in breast cancer surgery. World J Surg Oncol. 2006;4:79.

3. Stearns V, Ewing CA, Slack R, Penannen MF, Hayes DF, Tsangaris

TN. Sentinel lymphadenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy

for breast cancer may reliable represent the axilla except for inflammatory breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2002;9:235-42.

4. Xing Y, Foy M, Cox DD, Kuerer HM, Hunt KK, Cormier JN. Metaanalysis of sentinel lymph node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Br J Surg. 2005;93(5):539-46.

5. Zavagno G, Rubello D, Franchini Z, Meggiolaro A, Ballarin A,

Casara A, et al. Axillary sentinel lymph nodes in breast cancer:

a single lymphatic pathway drains the entire mammary gland. J

Cancer Surg. 2005;31:479-84.

6. Zavagno G, De Salvo G, Scalco G, Bozza F, Barutta L, Del Bianco P, et al. A randomized clinical trial on sentinel lymph node

biopsy versus lymph node dissection in breast cancer. Ann Surg. 2008;247(2):207-13.

7. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in

breast cancer: update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet

Oncol. 2006;7:983-90.

8. Schwartz GF, Giuliano AE, Veronesi U. Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on the Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in

Carcinoma of the Breast, April 10-22, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Cancer. 2001:94:2542-7.

9. Senn HJ, Thurlimann B, Goldhrisch A, Wood WC, Gelber RD,

Coates AS. Comments on the St. Gallen Consensus 2003 on the

primary therapy of early breast cancer. Breast. 2003;12:569-82.

10. Lyman GH, Giuliano AE, Somerfiels MR, Benson AB 3rd, Bodurka DC, Burstein HJ, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology

Guideline Recommendations for sentinel lymph node biopsy in

early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(30):7702-20.

11. Araújo HR, Costa LOBF, Costa HLFF, Neto JEVB, Filho ASSF,

Colares MCR. Linfonodo sentinela: novos rumos no tratamento

do câncer de mama. Rev Bras Mastol. 2004:14(2):61-6.

12. Balch GC, Mithani SK, Richards KR, Beauchamp RD, Kelley

MC. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy after

preoperative therapy for stage II and III breast cancer. Ann Surg

Oncol. 2003;10:616-21.

13. Haid A, Tausch C, Lang A, Lutz J, Fritzsche H, Peschina W, et al.

Is sentinel lymph node biopsy reliable and indicated after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with breast carcinoma? Cancer.

2001;92(5):1080-4.

14. Mamounas EP, Brown A, Anderson S, Smith R, Julian T, Miller

B, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in

breast cancer: results from national surgical adjuvant breast and

bowel project protocol B-27. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23(12).

15. Filippakis GM, Zografos G. Contraindications of sentinel lymph

node biopsy: are there any really? World J Surg Oncol. 2007;5:1-10.

16. Carmon M, Olsha O, Schecter P, Raveh D, Reinus C, Hershko

DD. The "sentinel chain": a new concept for prediction of axillary node status in breast cancer patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat.

2006;97:323-8.

17. Noguchi M. Current controversies concerning sentinel lymph node

biopsy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2004;84:261-71.

18. Schwartz GF. SLNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In: 5th Bienal International Sentinel Node Society Meeting. Sentinel node

biopsy: new boundaries. 2006:39.

19. Brady EW. Sentinel lymph node mapping following neoadjuvant

chemotherapy for breast cancer. Breast J. 2002;8(2):97-100.

20. Breslin TM, Cohen L, Sahin A, Fleming JB, Kuerer HM, Newman

LA, et al. Sentinel node biopsy is accurate after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2000;18(20):3480-6.

21. Cohen LF, Breslin TM, Kuerer HM, Ross MI, Hunt KK, Sahin

AA. Identification and evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph nodes

in patients with breast carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg Patholy. 2000;24(9):1266-72.

22. Pendas S, Jakub J, Giuliano R, Gardner M, Swor GB, Reintgen DS. The role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients

with ductal carcinoma in situ or with locally advanced breast

cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Cancer Control.

2004;11(4):231-5.

23. Tausch CH, Konstantiniuk P, Jorg L, Dubsky P, Deninson U, Haid

A, et al. Sentinel node biopsy after preoperative chemotherapy in

breast carcinoma - is it safe? Eur Surg. 2002;34(5):283.

24. Nanson KS, Anderson BO, Byrd DR, Dunnwald LK, Eary JF,

Mankoff DA, et al. Increased false negative sentinel node biopsy

rates after preoperative chemotherapy for invasive breast carcinoma. Cancer. 2000;89(11):2187-94.

25. Piato JRM, Barros ACSD, Pincerato KM, Vigário AO, Pinotti

JA. Acurácia do linfonodo sentinela em pacientes com câncer inicial da mama tratadas com quimioterapia neoadjuvante. RBGO.

2002;24(2):81-4.

26. Schenk P, Hochreiner G, Fridrik M, Wayand W. Sentinel node

biopsy performed before preoperative chemotherapy for axillary

lymph node staging in breast cancer. Breast J. 2003;9(4):282-7.

27. Kinoshita T, Takasugi M, Iwamoto E, Akashi-Tanaka S, Fukutomi T, Terui S. Sentinel lymph node biopsy examination for breast

cancer patients with clinically negative axillary lymph nodes after

neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Am J Surg. 2006;191:225-9.

28. Tanaka Y, Maeda H, Ogawa Y, Nishioka A, Kubota K, Ue H, et al.

Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer patients treatedwith neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Oncol Rep. 2006;15(4):927-31.

29. Goyal A, Newcombe RG, Chabra A, Mansel RE. Factors affecting

failed localization and false-negative rates of sentinel node biopsy

in breast cancer - results of the ALMANAC validation phase.

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2006;99:203-8.

30. Kinoshita T. Sentinel lymph node biopsy is feasible for breast

cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer. 2007:14(1):10-5.

31. Veronesi U, Mariani L, Decensi A, Formelli F, Camerini T, Miceli R,

et al. Fifteen-year results of a randomized phase III trial of fenretinide

to prevent second breast cancer. Ann Oncol. 2006;17:1065-71.

32. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de Atenção à Saúde. Instituto Nacional do Câncer. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância.

Estimativa 2006: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro:

INCA 2005:1-94.

33. Macchetti AH. Estadiamento do câncer de mama diagnosticado no Sistema Público de Saúde de São Carlos. Medicina.

2007;40(3):394-402.

34. Gonzalez-Angulo AM, Morales-Vasquez F, Hortobagyl GN.

Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast

cancer. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2007;608:1-22.

35. Rustogi A, Budrukkar A, Dinshaw K, Jatali R. Management of

locally advanced breast cancer: evolution ans current practice. J

Cancer Res Ther. 2005;1(1):21-30.

36. Motomura K, Egawa C, Komoike Y, Kataoka T, Naguno S, Koyama H, et al. Sentinel node biopsy for breast cancer: technical aspects and controversies. Breast Cancer. 2007;14(1):25-30.

37. Abreu e Lima MCC. Relatório anatomopatológico em carcinoma da mama: fatores morfológicos tradicionais. Rev Bras Mastol.

2001;11(3):104-12.

38. Treseler P. Pathologic examination of the sentinel lymph node:

what is the best method? Breast J. 2006;12(Suppl 2):S143-51.

39. Rönkä R, Von Smitten K, Tasmuth T, Leidenius M. One-year

morbidity after sentinel node biopsy and breast surgery. The Breast. 2005;14:28-36.

40. Sacchini V. Sentinel node biopsy in breast cancer. In: 5th Bienal International Sentinel Node Society Meeting. Sentinel node biopsy:

new boundaries. 2006:38.

Published

2026-07-26

How to Cite

Bezerra, S. O., & FIlho, A. S. dos S. F. (2026). Sensitivity and specificity of axillary sentinel lymph node after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced breast cancer. Revista Brasileira De Mastologia, 18(3). Retrieved from https://mastology.org/rbm/article/view/2028

Issue

Section

Original Article