Is it possible to omit axillary surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer? Preliminary outcomes in patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment in the ongoing venus trial – a randomized controlled clinical trial

Autores

  • Maria Beatriz de Paula Leite Kraft Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
  • Giuliano Mendes Duarte Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
  • Danielle Cristina Miyamoto Araújo Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
  • Rodrigo Menezes Jales Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
  • Vinicius Milani Budel Universidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
  • Lucas Roskamp Budel Universidade Federal do Paraná, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
  • Luis Otávio Sarian Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics.
  • VENUS TRIAL Group VENUS TRIAL Group.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29289/259453942024V34S1008

Palavras-chave:

node-negative breast cancer, sentinel lymph node dissection, axillary staging, axillary surgery omission

Resumo

Objective: Axillary surgery omission after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) in breast cancer (BC) has not yet been studied.
VENUS (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05315154, ReBEC RBR-8g6jbf, Ethics approved: CAAE: 06805118.2.0000.5404) is an ongoing
trial that evaluates the omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in early BC and allows the inclusion of patients
submitted to NAT. The aim of this study was to present preliminary axillary outcomes in patients submitted to NAT and
compare them with patients referred to upfront surgery in the VENUS trial. Methodology: This is a multicenter, prospective, non-inferiority, open, randomized controlled clinical trial that includes women with stage T1/T2, N0 (clinical/
ultrasound) M0 BC, randomized to SLNB or no axillary surgery. The initial treatment could be NAT or up-front surgery,
based on local protocol at each study center. After NAT, axillary ultrasound should also be negative before randomization. Results: Up to 4.5 years after the VENUS trial started, 322 women were randomized. NAT was performed in 8%
(n=26), of which 12 were randomized to SLNB (neoSLNB group) and 14 to no axillary surgery. Breast overall pCR rate was
39.1%. In the neoSLNB group, 41.7% had triple negative, 8.3% HER2, 25% luminal HER, and 25% luminal vs. 1.3%, 1.9%,
9.5%, and 87.4%, respectively, in the upfront surgery group (p<0.001). The mean tumor size was 2.3 cm in the neoSLNB
vs 1.5 cm upfront surgery group (p<0.001). In the neoSLNB group, there were 8.3% of axillary positivity (1/12) and 20.9%
(28/134) in the upfront surgery group (p<0.05). So far, there has been no axillary recurrence (mean follow-up of 20 months). Conclusion: Patients submitted to NAT had larger and more aggressive tumors than patients in the upfront surgery. Axillary positivity after NAT was lower than in patients referred to upfront surgery. Until now, there have been no
axillary recurrences in the VENUS trial.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Downloads

Publicado

2026-03-05

Como Citar

Kraft, M. B. de P. L., Duarte, G. M., Araújo, D. C. M., Jales, R. M., Budel, V. M., Budel, L. R., … Group, V. T. (2026). Is it possible to omit axillary surgery after neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer? Preliminary outcomes in patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment in the ongoing venus trial – a randomized controlled clinical trial. Mastology, 34(suppl. 1). https://doi.org/10.29289/259453942024V34S1008

Edição

Seção

Oral Presentation